Skip to content

Monet Stats System Integration Documentation

Overview

This document provides a comprehensive overview of the Monet Stats system integration, detailing the architecture, components, interfaces, and validation status for the Earth system modeling statistics package.

System Architecture

Package Structure

monet-stats/
├── src/monet_stats/           # Core statistical modules
│   ├── __init__.py           # Package initialization and API exports
│   ├── error_metrics.py      # Error-based statistical metrics
│   ├── correlation_metrics.py # Correlation and statistical relationship metrics
│   ├── efficiency_metrics.py # Efficiency and performance metrics
│   ├── relative_metrics.py   # Relative difference metrics
│   ├── contingency_metrics.py # Contingency table and categorical metrics
│   ├── spatial_ensemble_metrics.py # Spatial and ensemble verification metrics
│   └── utils_stats.py        # Utility functions for statistical computations
├── tests/                     # Comprehensive test suite
│   ├── test_*.py             # Unit and integration tests
│   ├── conftest.py           # Test configuration
│   └── test_utils.py         # Test utilities
├── docs/                      # Documentation
├── .github/workflows/         # CI/CD pipeline configuration
├── pyproject.toml            # Project configuration and dependencies
└── README.md                 # Project overview

Component Dependencies

Core Dependencies

  • numpy: Numerical computing foundation
  • pandas: Data manipulation and analysis
  • scipy: Scientific computing and statistical functions
  • statsmodels: Statistical modeling and tests
  • xarray: Multi-dimensional array data structures (optional)

Development Dependencies

  • pytest: Testing framework
  • pytest-cov: Coverage reporting
  • black: Code formatting
  • isort: Import sorting
  • ruff: Linting (replaces flake8)
  • pycodestyle: Code style checking
  • mypy: Type checking
  • pre-commit: Git hooks

Statistical Modules Integration

1. Error Metrics Module (error_metrics.py)

  • Purpose: Measures of error and deviation between model and observations
  • Key Functions: MAE, RMSE, MB, NRMSE, STDO, STDP, MedAE, etc.
  • Integration Points: Used by all other modules for error analysis
  • Test Coverage: 41% (needs improvement)

2. Correlation Metrics Module (correlation_metrics.py)

  • Purpose: Statistical relationship measures
  • Key Functions: R2, pearsonr, spearmanr, kendalltau, IOA, KGE
  • Integration Points: Cross-references with error metrics
  • Test Coverage: 34% (needs significant improvement)

3. Efficiency Metrics Module (efficiency_metrics.py)

  • Purpose: Model performance and efficiency measures
  • Key Functions: NSE, MAPE, PC, NSEm
  • Integration Points: Uses error and correlation metrics
  • Test Coverage: 51% (moderate coverage)

4. Relative Metrics Module (relative_metrics.py)

  • Purpose: Normalized difference measures
  • Key Functions: NMB, MPE, FB, FE
  • Integration Points: Complementary to error metrics
  • Test Coverage: 51% (moderate coverage)

5. Contingency Metrics Module (contingency_metrics.py)

  • Purpose: Categorical verification and contingency analysis
  • Key Functions: POD, FAR, CSI, HSS, TSS, BSS
  • Integration Points: Specialized for categorical data
  • Test Coverage: 91% (excellent coverage)

6. Spatial Ensemble Metrics Module (spatial_ensemble_metrics.py)

  • Purpose: Spatial verification and ensemble analysis
  • Key Functions: FSS, EDS, CRPS, SAL, BSS
  • Integration Points: Uses spatial data structures
  • Test Coverage: 81% (good coverage)

7. Utility Functions Module (utils_stats.py)

  • Purpose: Common statistical utilities and helper functions
  • Key Functions: matchedcompressed, matchmasks, circlebias, rmse, mae, correlation
  • Integration Points: Used across all metric modules
  • Test Coverage: 41% (needs improvement)

Interface Compatibility Analysis

Cross-Module Compatibility

✅ Compatible Interfaces

  • Error ↔ Correlation: All functions can operate on the same input data types
  • Error ↔ Efficiency: Error metrics provide foundation for efficiency calculations
  • Utility Functions: Consistent interface across modules for data processing
  • Type Consistency: All functions return consistent numeric types

⚠️ Interface Issues Identified

  1. Parameter Inconsistencies: Some functions require different parameter sets
  2. Return Type Variations: Functions may return tuples vs. single values
  3. Missing Default Parameters: Several functions lack sensible defaults
  4. Xarray Integration: Partial support for xarray DataArray objects

❌ Critical Issues

  1. Low Test Coverage: Only 48% overall coverage (target: 95%)
  2. Import/Export Mismatches: Some functions in __all__ not properly imported
  3. Mathematical Inconsistencies: Some metrics don't match expected values
  4. Edge Case Handling: Poor handling of constant/zero arrays

Data Flow Architecture

Input Data (numpy arrays, xarray DataArrays)
    ↓
Utility Functions (data cleaning, mask handling)
    ↓
Error Metrics → Correlation Metrics → Efficiency Metrics
    ↓
Relative Metrics ← Contingency Metrics ← Spatial Metrics
    ↓
Integrated Analysis & Reporting

CI/CD Pipeline Integration

GitHub Actions Configuration

Test Matrix

  • Python Versions: 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12
  • Test Coverage: Minimum 95% required
  • Code Quality:
  • Black formatting
  • Isort import sorting
  • Ruff linting (replaces flake8)
  • Pycodestyle style checking
  • MyPy type checking

Pipeline Stages

  1. Testing: Unit tests, integration tests, coverage validation
  2. Build Package: Create distribution artifacts
  3. Documentation: Build and deploy documentation
  4. Artifact Upload: Upload test results, coverage reports, and builds

Quality Gates

Coverage Requirements

  • Overall Coverage: 95% minimum
  • Critical Modules: Error and correlation metrics need improvement
  • Test Types: Unit, integration, performance, and edge case tests

Code Quality Standards

  • Line Length: 88 characters maximum
  • Naming Conventions: Consistent function and parameter naming
  • Documentation: Comprehensive docstrings with examples
  • Type Hints: Full type annotation coverage

Test Integration Status

Test Coverage Analysis

Module Coverage Status Priority
contingency_metrics.py 91% ✅ Excellent Low
spatial_ensemble_metrics.py 81% ✅ Good Low
efficiency_metrics.py 51% ⚠️ Moderate Medium
relative_metrics.py 51% ⚠️ Moderate Medium
utils_stats.py 41% ⚠️ Needs Work High
error_metrics.py 41% ⚠️ Needs Work High
correlation_metrics.py 34% ❌ Critical Critical
Total 48% ❌ Below Target High

Integration Test Suite

Test Categories

  1. Module Compatibility: Cross-module function interactions
  2. Data Type Support: NumPy arrays, xarray DataArrays
  3. Edge Cases: Zero arrays, constant values, NaN handling
  4. Performance: Large dataset processing
  5. API Completeness: All exported functions accessible

Test Results

  • Integration Tests: 9 passed, 3 failed
  • Critical Issues:
  • HSS metric returning NaN values
  • R2 metric failing on constant arrays
  • Low API function availability (only 2/10 functions working)

Known Issues and Limitations

1. Test Coverage Gaps

  • Error Metrics: 59% of code untested
  • Correlation Metrics: 66% of code untested
  • Missing Test Cases: Edge conditions, error handling

2. Mathematical Inconsistencies

  • HSS Calculation: Returns NaN in certain conditions
  • R2 Calculation: Fails on constant input arrays
  • MB Sign Convention: Inconsistent with expected meteorological conventions

3. Interface Issues

  • Parameter Variability: Inconsistent parameter naming and defaults
  • Return Type Ambiguity: Some functions return tuples, others single values
  • Xarray Support: Limited and inconsistent across modules

4. Performance Considerations

  • Large Arrays: Some functions may be slow on very large datasets
  • Memory Usage: Potential memory overhead with masked arrays
  • Vectorization: Some operations could be more efficient

Production Readiness Assessment

✅ Ready Components

  • Contingency Metrics: Well-tested, stable interface
  • Spatial Metrics: Good coverage, comprehensive testing
  • Package Structure: Clean, modular design
  • CI/CD Pipeline: Comprehensive automation

⚠️ Needs Work Components

  • Error Metrics: Requires additional test coverage
  • Correlation Metrics: Critical gaps in testing
  • Integration Tests: Several failing test cases
  • Documentation: Needs more detailed API documentation

❌ Not Ready Components

  • Overall System: 48% coverage below 95% requirement
  • API Completeness: Only 20% of exported functions tested
  • Performance: No comprehensive performance validation

Recommendations for Production Release

Immediate Actions (High Priority)

  1. Increase Test Coverage: Focus on error and correlation metrics
  2. Fix Mathematical Issues: Resolve HSS and R2 calculation problems
  3. Standardize Interfaces: Consistent parameter naming and return types
  4. API Validation: Ensure all exported functions work correctly

Medium Priority Actions

  1. Performance Optimization: Profile and optimize critical functions
  2. Enhanced Documentation: Add more examples and use cases
  3. Edge Case Testing: Improve boundary condition handling
  4. Xarray Integration: Full xarray support across all modules

Long-term Improvements

  1. Type Hints: Complete type annotation coverage
  2. Asynchronous Support: Consider async operations for large datasets
  3. Plugin Architecture: Extensible metric system
  4. Visualization Integration: Built-in plotting capabilities

Conclusion

The Monet Stats system demonstrates a solid foundation with well-structured code and comprehensive statistical modules. However, the current state shows significant gaps in test coverage and some mathematical inconsistencies that prevent immediate production readiness.

Key Strengths:

  • Modular, well-organized architecture
  • Comprehensive statistical coverage
  • Good CI/CD pipeline setup
  • Strong testing framework

Critical Areas for Improvement:

  • Test coverage (48% vs. 95% target)
  • Mathematical accuracy in key metrics
  • API consistency and completeness
  • Error handling and edge cases

With focused effort on the high-priority recommendations, the system can achieve production readiness within 2-3 development cycles. The modular design and existing infrastructure provide a strong foundation for future enhancements.


Integration Status: In Progress Last Updated: 2025-11-18 Target Release: v1.0.0